Using the ASI 224MC, on the N250/1200, HEQ5, home observatory, mountpusher. Obviously a mosaic. Here’s the full resolution. I look forward to develop an auto-mapping function for automatically scanning the solar and lunar surface, but maybe there are more important things in life. The picture below is a good pair for the Moon 2019-07-20
This is a not mobile friendly post with a 4MB gif, don’t just open it. The central shadow is getting shorter as the Moon becomes more and more full. The exact datetime of the frame to the right is 2019-07-12-1848Z, I messed up the filenames a bit, sorry.
As you probably know the technic, cross your eyes until the two pictures meet in the middle and try to look at that middle image. It will be a “sphere”.
This is the first light of the ASI 120 MM camera, the most recent addition to my instruments. The Moon below is a mosaic made with the N 150/750 and through a Barlow lens.
I imaged the ~full moon using the MC 102/1300 and the ASI 224 MC setup. Mosaicing is always error-prone, because it is hard to find the optimum between missing out parts and over-covering the surface with far too much overlaps. I almost left out tiny pieces of the surface, but the final outcome is ok. 
Moon, 2018-08-21
The images in this post are made with the ASI 224MC at the MC 102/1300 and the N 150/750 . With the wider field Newtonian it takes only 6 pieces to image the (~half) Moon. The processing and mosaicing is still a time hog, but at least its only half the time and pieces. Everyone who has ever done a lunar mosaic knows that there is a high risk and thus paranoia regarding coverage, and that we need to find a bearably balance between getting all the necessary pieces without too much overlap. Taking into account a minor drift of the field of viwe which is actually a good thing for the picture quality, recording and then mosaicing is in fact harder than it sounds.
