Monthly archives: december, 2016

California Nebula, Pleiades Cluster

California nebula and the Pleiades

Two nebulae and a cluster – perhaps the cluster – in one frame, this is the NGC 1499 California emission nebula and the M45 Pleiades open cluster with the reflection nebula it is passing through. Parts of the complex nebula system are also visible, with a hint of the LBN 777 Baby Eagle Nebula being there too. This picture was a challenge due to less than ideal transparency, odd gradients on the sky and the approaching moonrise. My starheal program did a great job. California Nebula and the Pleiades, 10×2 min, ISO 1600, Canon 1100D mod, Canon 50mm f/1.8 @ f/3.5, HEQ5, Dângău Mare, 2016-11-20

(tovább…)

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Her Majesty, Queen Cassiopeia

Cassiopeia, 23×3 min, ISO 1600, Canon 1100D mod, 50 mm f/1.8 @ f/4, HEQ5, Dângău Mare

(tovább…)

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

elliptical

I recently composed this one:

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

StarHeal – how I handle the dense star fields

Left: the original. Right: the automated output: less prominent stars, no panda eyes.

The Milky Way offers some great wide angle views for the astrophotographer. But there is a catch: the dense star field. While in theory stars are point like, ie subpixel sized, in practice the seeing, some worse than ideal transparency, lens errors, bad focus, a not that parallel lens and sensor, a bit of dew – all work against the astrophotographer.

While I can’t solve all the problems, I sure can try. So I wrote a program. I found that I can mitigate some of the problems: the blown up stars, the panda eye image artifact around stars with middle range luminosity and the overall visual impact of the star field. I continued to develop the previous version of my software, so here’s what I’ve got now.

The program

I wrote the program in PHP because it is the language I mainly use. It is not the best choice, by far. But it does the job I expect it to do. All you need is a webserver, some storage space, memory and time. You may download it from here. (tovább…)

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Heart and Soul, reprocessed

Heart and Soul in Cassiopeia

This time I used two old data sets of IC 1805 and IC 1848, one from when the camera has not been modified yet and one from last summer, both under fair skies.

(1) 41×2 min, ISO 1600, Canon EF 200mm f2.8L II USM at F/3.5, Canon 1100D unmod, EQ3 (see article)
(2) 8×3 min, ISO 1600, Canon EF 200mm f2.8L II USM at F/4, Canon 1100D mod, HEQ5 (see article)

I reduced the stars with my own program.

Galaxies Maffei 1 and Maffei 2 are also in the frame, the yellow patches on the bottom. Both galaxies are in the zone of avoidance, ie in the plane of the Milky Way where the dust adds up to be almost opaque. Wiki says 99.5% of the light of Maffei 2 is obscured. In a crop below I emphasize these objects with infrared data from WISE. The dust is mostly transparent at infrared wavelengths.

(tovább…)

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

NGC 7000 North America (the December 2016 version)

I once more reprocessed the North America raws I have from 2015.

20151213_north_america_ngc7000_processedon20161216_nostars100

 

(tovább…)

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

NGC 1499 California Nebula

20161204_z_ngc1944_california_nebula_stack1_crop_dss1_psc_nostars075The sky allowed only very few exposures on this object, and the -8°C temperature was somewhat unforgiving. In order to cancel out a known lens error (the lens seems to be off a bit from the ideal perpendicular), I rotated the gear 180 degrees at half of the session.

Canon 1100D mod, 14×2 min, ISO 1600, Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM at f/4, HEQ5, Dângău Mare

(tovább…)

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

IC 2944, the Running Chicken reprocessed

I reprocessed the data obtained in Namibia, processed a few times before.

20160501_running_chicken_branch20161201_nostars076

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Jól kalibrált monitoron mindegyik számnál elkülönülő árnyalat látszik. Ha mégsem látszanak, akkor a megjelenített képek színhiányosan rajzolódnak ki. A monitort valószínűleg kalibrálni kell.

You should see distinct shades for each number. If those shades are not clearly visible, the displayed pictures will lack accuracy. Your display most likely needs to be calibrated (brightness, gamma, contrast etc.).