Magyar menüt kérek. Show menu in Hungarian

Category: english

Venus, near the Sun

Venus, 1.2% crescent, two days before minimum elongation

I observed Venus’ very narrow crescent at only two days before the inferior conjunction, ie minimum elongation, at less than 9 degrees from the Sun, with only 1.2% illumination. Since this is a personal record, besides the transit observed in 2012, let me just paste here some trivia from Stellarium. Due to the Sun being very close, this post is something with the label: kids, don’t try this at home.

Venus on 2017-03-23 at 11:30 UTC:
distance: 42 million km (during the 2012 transit, it was 43 away)
apparent diameter: 59.3″ (1/30 of the Sun’s / Moon’s diameter)
illumination: 1.2% (this year’s minimum will be 1%, in two days)
position: 10°10′, 9 min
elongation: 8°58’52″(this year’s minimum, ie the inferior conjunction is just under 8°17′, on 2017-03-25 at around 16:30 UTC)

The equipment was a Scopium webcam at the SW MC 102/1300 scope on an HEQ5 mount, with or without a 2x barlow.

Finding Venus
Maybe it’s my bad, but I found no obvious daytime alignment method (like use the Sun, the Moon beeing too far away) in the controller. Being a temporary backyard setup, with no alignment at all (I have a general idea where north is), I started at the Sun with an ND 3.8 Baader solar filter, in order to adjust both the focus and get an idea about the coordinates the mount thinks it is pointing to. Then, having the Sun’s and Venus’ position from Stellarium, I guided the scope to the assumed coordinates. Given the glare of the Sun, visual observations were off the table, even with the improvised shade. So all that remained was canvasing the area with the filter now off, through the keyhole-like narrow field of the webcam. (Yes, I could have used the aligned finder scope’s wide field with the camera, but then again: the Sun). After a while (Hofstadter’s law applied), I succeeded :)

Some pictures below, they show details like how the color of the sky is off due to the white balance being off while recording with the color webcam.

(tovább…)


NGC 6888 Crescent Nebula

NGC 6888 Crescent Nebula, 50×45 sec

I found some forgotten raw material I collected during the summer. Tech details show the frames were more like tests than a serious attempt at photographing this object. Nevertheless it was worth the shot.

NGC 6888, also known to amateurs as Caldwell 27, the Crescent nebula is a faint, 10m deep sky object in Cygnus, near the well known Sadr (γ Cygni) region. The nebula is blown by the Wolf-Rayet star WR 136 (HD 192163).

(tovább…)


2016: my astrophotography adventure

(tovább…)


California Nebula, Pleiades Cluster

California nebula and the Pleiades

Two nebulae and a cluster – perhaps the cluster – in one frame, this is the NGC 1499 California emission nebula and the M45 Pleiades open cluster with the reflection nebula it is passing through. Parts of the complex nebula system are also visible, with a hint of the LBN 777 Baby Eagle Nebula being there too. This picture was a challenge due to less than ideal transparency, odd gradients on the sky and the approaching moonrise. My starheal program did a great job. California Nebula and the Pleiades, 10×2 min, ISO 1600, Canon 1100D mod, Canon 50mm f/1.8 @ f/3.5, HEQ5, Dângău Mare, 2016-11-20

(tovább…)


elliptical

I recently composed this one:

 


StarHeal – how I handle the dense star fields

Left: the original. Right: the automated output: less prominent stars, no panda eyes.

The Milky Way offers some great wide angle views for the astrophotographer. But there is a catch: the dense star field. While in theory stars are point like, ie subpixel sized, in practice the seeing, some worse than ideal transparency, lens errors, bad focus, a not that parallel lens and sensor, a bit of dew – all work against the astrophotographer.

While I can’t solve all the problems, I sure can try. So I wrote a program. I found that I can mitigate some of the problems: the blown up stars, the panda eye image artifact around stars with middle range luminosity and the overall visual impact of the star field. I continued to develop the previous version of my software, so here’s what I’ve got now.

The program

I wrote the program in PHP because it is the language I mainly use. It is not the best choice, by far. But it does the job I expect it to do. All you need is a webserver, some storage space, memory and time. You may download it from here. (tovább…)


Heart and Soul, reprocessed

Heart and Soul in Cassiopeia

This time I used two old data sets of IC 1805 and IC 1848, one from when the camera has not been modified yet and one from last summer, both under fair skies.

(1) 41×2 min, ISO 1600, Canon EF 200mm f2.8L II USM at F/3.5, Canon 1100D unmod, EQ3 (see article)
(2) 8×3 min, ISO 1600, Canon EF 200mm f2.8L II USM at F/4, Canon 1100D mod, HEQ5 (see article)

I reduced the stars with my own program.

Galaxies Maffei 1 and Maffei 2 are also in the frame, the yellow patches on the bottom. Both galaxies are in the zone of avoidance, ie in the plane of the Milky Way where the dust adds up to be almost opaque. Wiki says 99.5% of the light of Maffei 2 is obscured. In a crop below I emphasize these objects with infrared data from WISE. The dust is mostly transparent at infrared wavelengths.

(tovább…)


NGC 1499 California Nebula

20161204_z_ngc1944_california_nebula_stack1_crop_dss1_psc_nostars075The sky allowed only very few exposures on this object, and the -8°C temperature was somewhat unforgiving. In order to cancel out a known lens error (the lens seems to be off a bit from the ideal perpendicular), I rotated the gear 180 degrees at half of the session.

Canon 1100D mod, 14×2 min, ISO 1600, Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM at f/4, HEQ5, Dângău Mare

(tovább…)


IC 2944, the Running Chicken reprocessed

I reprocessed the data obtained in Namibia, processed a few times before.

20160501_running_chicken_branch20161201_nostars076


Centaurus, Crux, Carina

Two pictures this time, both featuring Crux. Differences in processing technics and regarding the invested amount of time are visible.

alpha and beta Centauri, the Coalsack and Crux, 20x240s, ISO 800, 50 mm, F/5

alpha and beta Centauri, the Coalsack and Crux, 20x240s, ISO 800, 50 mm, F/5

The Coalsack, Crux and the Carina Nebula, 43x135s, ISO 800, 50 mm, F/4

The Coalsack, Crux and the Carina Nebula, 43x135s, ISO 800, 50 mm, F/4

 

(tovább…)


Jól kalibrált monitoron mindegyik számnál elkülönülő árnyalat látszik. Ha mégsem látszanak, akkor a megjelenített képek színhiányosan rajzolódnak ki. A monitort valószínűleg kalibrálni kell.

You should see distinct shades for each number. If those shades are not clearly visible, the displayed pictures will lack accuracy. Your display most likely needs to be calibrated (brightness, gamma, contrast etc.).