One day after the X1.8 flare, business as usual on the Sun. I collected 40 scans in the Helium I D3 line, spanning about 40 minutes — so if there were any small scale details to begin with, they are probably lost.
One day after the X1.8 flare, business as usual on the Sun. I collected 40 scans in the Helium I D3 line, spanning about 40 minutes — so if there were any small scale details to begin with, they are probably lost.
The Sun on 2024-09-13, around the CaH line, also touching Hydrogen epsilon. Pixel shifts range from -36 pixels (blue wing) to +40 pixels (red wing), meaning somewhere around -2..+2 Å in total, give or take.
Since Google is no longer our friend[1], thus finding the things we are looking for has become harder and harder[2], I decided to assemble a few things that help me tame JSol’Ex.
JSol’Ex Repo: https://github.com/melix/astro4j
JSol’Ex downloads: https://melix.github.io/astro4j/latest/en/jsolex.html
Help/Docs (at ImageMath): https://melix.github.io/astro4j/latest/fr/jsolex.html#imagemath
Extracting the Hydrogen Epsilon line, like it was He I D3, simple version (where, relative to CaH, epsilon is at +25px)
A verbose and more complex version of the epsilon script:
This really feels like standing on the shoulders of giants. I got my Sol’Ex spectroheliograph, and started using it with INTI and JSol’Ex (links below). Long story short, while the Sol’Ex in the plastic feels like a toy, it bends, sags and kinks and twists and vibrates and all, I find it an excellent introduction, and beyond, to solargraphy and spectroscopy. The software? It blows my mind.
I’ve been photographing the Sun for more than two years now almost each and every day, in a bit of a hackish way: using all kinds of filters beyond the 540nm continuum – hydrogen alpha – near UV calcium triad. However, as I advanced, I discovered that this knowledge is simply not common in the community, and not just that, it’s also a bit hard to come by while googling around. Also, to better explain double stacking, off banding and similar stuff, articles like this one Altair Astro’s 3nm CaK Ultra filter: testing, comparison, review are maybe rare.
So I put together an interactive tool to play around with spectra, in a way amateur astronomers find it interesting. The Spectral Composer.
I got a new filter to pudding-test: Altair Astro’s 3nm Calcium K Ultra, stated to have 3nm FWHM and a very high transmission. Let’s see how it performs.
Before we jump in, let me also present some information I compiled along the way, and some theory and links fellow amateur astronomers may find useful.
Important note: this article is not sponsored by the vendor, and the vendor has not influenced the conclusions presented below in any way.
With a front ERF, Altair Astro’s Triband, 115mm, Tecnosky 102/1100 refractor, Lunt’s CaK B1800 and the ASI 533MM camera, I obtained the following:
With a Tecnosky 102/1100 refractor, Herschel prism, ND 0.96, a filterwheel and the ASI 533MM camera, I obtained the following:

Antlia 3nm hydrogen alpha. The disk is clearly continuum, but the prominences were obvious even on the live view
Using a fairly new setup, as they were in the light train: Altair Astro Triband D-ERF 115mm, Tecnosky 102/1100 ED refractor, Lunt CaK B1800, ASI 533MM, along with my EQ3 with the home built controller, I captured the following frames.
A while back, well, in 2017, a friend mentioned rather publicly that I should put a donate button onto my website. So I put one into the sidebar of the main page, and into the photo planner. However, the software (the photo planner for example) and content (astrophotos, webcomic etc) I publish, they all remain as they were: free to use (unless fine print blah-blah).

Copyright © 2026 Csillagtúra.